Dr Evan Harris MP

Working hard for Oxford West and Abingdon since 1997

Dr Evan Harris MP

Response to calls for a judicial review of the HFEA's decision to license research using human-animal cytoplasmic hybrid embryos

12.00.00am BST (GMT +0100) Tue 8th Apr 2008

In response to calls for a judicial review of the HFEA's decision to license research using human-animal cytoplasmic hybrid embryos, Dr Evan Harris, Liberal Democrat Science spokesman, said:

"This legal challenge should fail because both the science and technology select committee, and the HFEA received clear legal advice that cybrid embryos were human embryos for the purpose of the 1990 Act, as all their chromosomal DNA is human, and that such research was permitted under the Act and the 2001 therapeutic cloning regulations"

"Critical to the unanimous decision of the select committee to recommend that the HFEA issue the licenses was our view that the work was valuable for medical research, that it got round the problem of the shortage of human eggs, and if it wasn't licensable it would be legal and completely unregulated which certainly was never Parliament's intention."

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story.
Comment on this news story.
Previous news story: Comment on news that Oxford & Bucks Mental Health Trust is today licensed as a Foundation Trust (Tue 1st Apr 2008).
Next news story: Dr Evan Harris discusses why he is campaigning actively against any reduction in the upper time limit for abortion as proposed by many anti-abortion MPs (Wed 14th May 2008).

Related News Stories:

Tue 1st Apr 2008:

Mon 8th Oct 2007:

Wed 5th Sep 2007:

Mon 3rd Sep 2007:

Wed 1st Aug 2007:

Mon 18th Jun 2007:

Tue 19th Jun 2007:

Wed 10th Jan 2007:

Tue 19th Dec 2006:

Thu 14th Dec 2006:

Tue 23rd May 2006:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and promoted by Dr Evan Harris MP, 27 Park End Street, Oxford OX1 1HU.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.