![]() |
![]() |
| 20th March 2010 | <info@evanharris.org.uk> | Dr Evan Harris MP |
Response to Government Proposals for revised legislation on Human Fertility & Embryology - chimeras, hybrids, screening and selection2.32.01pm GMT Thu 14th Dec 2006 Dr Evan Harris MP, Liberal Democrat member of the Science & Technology Select committee and a member of the BMA medical ethics committee responds to today's white paper outlining the Government's proposals for revising legislation on human fertility and embryology. 'hybrid' embryos created by human nuclei and enucleated animal eggs In response to the Government's proposal of a complete ban on such research, Dr Harris said: "The Government are wrong to propose a complete ban in respect of research using an embryo created by combing a human nucleus and an animal egg with their nuclear DNA taken out. Such entities are practically human and surely do not require greater protection than fully human embryos." Embryo screening for medical reasons The Government proposes that Parliament should define some limites or criteria that apply to testing of embryos. Dr Harris responded: "It is disappointing that the Government has insisted that what is now routine screening of embryos for medical conditions should still be subject to extra regulation in addition the usual and manifold regulation of healthcare that exists in this country already - involving professional regulation, college and NICE guidelines, clinical ethics committees, informed consent, and the healthcare commission. This is unjustified over- regulation." Embryo selection for family balancing The Science & Technology Select Committee inquiry into human fertilisation technologies and the law recommended that sex selection for family balancing be permitted. The Government has proposed that sex selection for family balancing should be prohibited. Dr Harris said: "I am disappointed that the Government has rejected the Science and Technology Select Committee view on this issue, without providing a good reason to bar families with - say - three boys from using medical technology to try to ensure they have a girl" "The intrusiveness and disproportionality of this decision will become clear when the Government try to ban DIY home methods of sperm sorting as they admit they will have to do."
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Mon 31st Mar 2008: Tue 25th Mar 2008: Mon 8th Oct 2007: Government Response on Human-Animal Hybrid Embryos: A Triumph for Rational Policy-Making. Wed 5th Sep 2007: Harris hails HFEA decision on hybrids. Wed 28th Mar 2007: Legislation needed to ensure vulnerable people's human rights protected. Wed 10th Jan 2007: Coalition of embryo experts makes last ditch bid to persuade HFEA on hybrids. Tue 19th Dec 2006: Government response on Human Trafficking Disappointing. Thu 14th Dec 2006: Response to Government Proposals for revised legislation on Human Fertility & Embryology. Published and promoted by Dr Evan Harris MP, 27 Park End Street, Oxford OX1 1HU. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |